Methods for in vitro evaluating antimicrobial activity of medicinal plants: the need for standardization

Authors

  • Tatiane Roquete Amparo Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto, Escola de Farmácia S/N, Morro do Cruzeiro, CEP 35400-000, Ouro Preto, MG, Brasil
  • Vanessa Cristina Carvalho Braga Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto, Escola de Farmácia S/N, Morro do Cruzeiro, CEP 35400-000, Ouro Preto, MG, Brasil
  • Janaína Brandão Seibert Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto, Escola de Farmácia S/N, Morro do Cruzeiro, CEP 35400-000, Ouro Preto, MG, Brasil
  • Gustavo Henrique Bianco de Souza Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto, Escola de Farmácia S/N, Morro do Cruzeiro, CEP 35400-000, Ouro Preto, MG, Brasil
  • Luiz Fernando Medeiros Teixeira Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto, Escola de Farmácia S/N, Morro do Cruzeiro, CEP 35400-000, Ouro Preto, MG, Brasil

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14450/2318-9312.v30.e1.a2018.pp50-59

Keywords:

medicinal plants, microbiology, microbial sensitivity tests

Abstract

The increasing incidence of resistant pathogens to current drugs encourages the search for new antimicrobial agents. In this context, medicinal plants are an important source of new drugs. There are several methods for evaluating the
antibacterial and antifungal activity of extracts, fractions, essential oils and isolated substances from the plant. The most known include diffusion, dilution and bioautography methods. The purpose of this paper is to present the most
used methods currently, along with their advantages, disadvantages and interfering factors. Among the works available in the SciELO database, covering the last ten years, only 4,4% of research on medicinal plants are related to the
antimicrobial activity. The most used method is microdilution (57,9%), the best recommended due to high sensitivity, the minimum quantity of reagents and sample and the possibility of a more significant number of replicates. In articles
that used this method, differences were observed in factors that may affect the results. Thereby, there is the need for standardization of methods used by researchers to facilitate obtaining comparable and reproducible results. To
achieve comparable and reproducible results, there is the need to standardize the methods used by the researchers. It is recommended to use as reference the standards established by CLSI for culture medium and inoculum concentration in
the tests. It also recommended the inclusion of negative control of the solubilization of the samples with quantification of microbial growth to avoid interference with the results.

Downloads

Published

2018-04-09

How to Cite

Roquete Amparo, T., Cristina Carvalho Braga, V., Brandão Seibert, J., Henrique Bianco de Souza, G., & Fernando Medeiros Teixeira, L. (2018). Methods for in vitro evaluating antimicrobial activity of medicinal plants: the need for standardization. Infarma - Pharmaceutical Sciences, 30(1), 50–59. https://doi.org/10.14450/2318-9312.v30.e1.a2018.pp50-59

Issue

Vol. 30 No. 1 (2018)

Section

Review Article

License

Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:

 

  1. Authors retain the copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Licença Creative Commons Attribution which allows the sharing of work with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are authorized to take additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (e.g. publish in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are allowed and encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their personal page) at any point before or during the editorial process, as this can generate productive changes as well as increase the impact and Citation of published work (See O Efeito do Acesso Livre ).