Analysis of adverse reactions reported spontaneously by pharmacists in a teaching hospital in Ceará

Authors

  • Ingrid Peixoto Furtado Hospital Universitário Walter Cantídio R. Pastor Samuel Munguba, 1290 - Rodolfo Teófilo, Fortaleza - CE, 60430-372
  • Andreína Fontenele Teixeira Hospital Universitário Walter CantídioR. Pastor Samuel Munguba, 1290 - Rodolfo Teófilo, Fortaleza - CE, 60430-372
  • Júlio César Castro Silva Hospital Universitário Walter Cantídio R. Pastor Samuel Munguba, 1290 - Rodolfo Teófilo, Fortaleza - CE, 60430-372
  • Maria Gabrielle Oliveira e Silva Linhares Hospital Universitário Walter Cantídio R. Pastor Samuel Munguba, 1290 - Rodolfo Teófilo, Fortaleza - CE, 60430-372
  • Patrícia Bastos Luz Instituto Doutor José Frota R. Barão do Rio Branco, 1816 - Centro, Fortaleza - CE, 60025-061
  • Luciana Mabel Ferreira Vasconcelos Félix Hospital Universitário Walter Cantídio R. Pastor Samuel Munguba, 1290 - Rodolfo Teófilo, Fortaleza - CE, 60430-372
  • José Martins de Alcantara Neto Hospital Universitário Walter Cantídio R. Pastor Samuel Munguba, 1290 - Rodolfo Teófilo, Fortaleza - CE, 60430-372
  • Alisson Menezes Araújo Lima Maternidade Escola Assis Chateaubriand Rua Coronel Nunes de Melo, s/n - Rodolfo Teófilo - CEP 60430-270 - Fortaleza - CE

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14450/2318-9312.v37.e1.a2025.pp88-103

Keywords:

Pharmacovigilance, Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions, Pharmacists

Abstract

Pharmacovigilance has as one of its main objectives the detection of adverse drug reactions (ADR), which 
are considered a serious public health problem contributing to increased morbidity and mortality. The method most used by pharmacovigilance to identify ADR is spontaneous reporting, due to its simplicity and low cost. This study aimed to analyze ADRs reported by pharmacists in a  teaching hospital. A cross-sec-tional, descriptive,  retrospective study was carried out, where information was  collected on ADRs reported by pharmacists to the Patient Safety Center from January 1, 2020 to December 31, 2022.  CEP/HUWC: 5,409,579. Of the 172 ADRs reported, 140 (81%) were performed by pharmacists, corresponding to 73 patients, 56.1% (43) female, with a mean age of 45.9 years,  48.6% (68) were hospitalized in clinical wards. The majority of ADRs (30.7%, N= 43) promoted disorders of the cutaneous and subcutaneous tissues, the most frequent reaction was pruritus 16.4% (23). Regarding the ATC classification, anti-infective drugs for systemic use received 90 notifications (62.1%), with polymyxin B being the most  prevalent in notifications, 17.1% (24). Regarding causality, 70.7% (99) of ADRs were considered possible and regarding severity, 121 (86.4%) were mild. One of the main limiting factors of the study was underreporting. In this scenario, the pharmacist stands out as a healthcare professional who spontaneously reports many adverse drug reactions (ADRs), contributing to increased patient safety.

Published

2026-03-31

How to Cite

Furtado, I. P., Teixeira, A. F., Silva, J. C. C., Linhares, M. G. O. e S., Luz, P. B., Félix, L. M. F. V., … Lima, A. M. A. (2026). Analysis of adverse reactions reported spontaneously by pharmacists in a teaching hospital in Ceará. Infarma - Pharmaceutical Sciences, 37(1), 88–103. https://doi.org/10.14450/2318-9312.v37.e1.a2025.pp88-103

Issue

Section

Original article

Similar Articles

1 2 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.